Which Countries Span Two Continents?

Geography — James William Steven Parker

Countries described as spanning two continents are commonly called transcontinental countries, meaning that their territory lies in two different continental divisions. The exact list depends on the geographical definition of continents being used, because continents are not defined by a single universally binding scientific boundary system. The clearest examples are Russia, Turkey, Egypt, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, although the classification of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan can depend on whether the conventional Europe Asia boundary follows the Greater Caucasus watershed or alternative boundaries.

Russia extends across eastern Europe and northern Asia and is geographically the largest transcontinental country by area. Turkey occupies both southeastern Europe and western Asia, with its European territory known as East Thrace and its Asian territory forming most of Anatolia. Egypt has its principal territory in northeastern Africa and the Sinai Peninsula in Asia, separated from the African mainland by the Suez Canal and connected geographically through the Sinai land bridge. Kazakhstan is overwhelmingly Asian but has a small portion west of the Ural River that is conventionally classified as European. Azerbaijan is generally regarded as transcontinental under boundary schemes that place part of the Greater Caucasus region in Europe.

Several other countries can be considered transcontinental under particular geographical definitions, so the answer is not completely fixed. Georgia is frequently described as lying at the boundary between Europe and Asia and is sometimes classified as transcontinental, particularly when the Greater Caucasus is treated as the Europe Asia boundary. Armenia is culturally and historically associated strongly with both Europe and Asia, but geographically it is generally placed in Western Asia rather than routinely classified as a transcontinental country.

Indonesia is an unusual case because its territory extends across the Asian and Oceanian geographical realms under some classifications, especially through the islands of western New Guinea and the associated biogeographical and political distinctions, although it is normally treated primarily as a Southeast Asian country.

Panama is sometimes discussed in connection with North and South America because Central America itself is variously treated as a subregion of North America or as an intermediate continental region, but this does not normally make Panama a transcontinental country in the same sense as Russia or Turkey. Countries can therefore be transcontinental because a land territory crosses a conventional continental boundary, while other apparent examples arise from different interpretations of what constitutes a continent or where its boundary lies.

Russia provides the most prominent example because the conventional Europe Asia boundary passes through its territory. The boundary is often traced through the Ural Mountains, the Ural River, the Caspian Sea, the Greater Caucasus or related features, and the Black Sea and Turkish Straits system. Under this convention, western Russia belongs to Europe and the vast territory east of the Urals belongs to Asia.

Although most of Russia by land area is in Asia, a substantial proportion of its population and many of its largest cities are in European Russia. Moscow and Saint Petersburg are therefore geographically European cities despite being parts of a state whose territory extends deep into northern Asia. Russia demonstrates why political size, population distribution and continental area need to be distinguished. A country does not cease to be European because most of its territory is Asian, nor does a continent have to contain a separate sovereign state for every portion of its physical landmass.

Turkey is another especially clear example because the Bosporus, Sea of Marmara and Dardanelles form a major geographical division between its European and Asian territories. The part of Turkey west of the Bosporus is generally called East Thrace and belongs geographically to southeastern Europe, while Anatolia constitutes the much larger Asian portion. Istanbul is especially notable because the city extends across the Bosporus and therefore occupies both Europe and Asia.

The Turkish example also illustrates the distinction between geographic location and cultural or political identity. Turkey is a member of several European institutions and has extensive historical connections with southeastern Europe, while most of its territory is physically located in Asia. Continental classification therefore describes geographical position and does not by itself determine cultural identity, political affiliation, historical identity or membership of an international organisation.

Egypt illustrates a different mechanism because its transcontinental status results from a relatively small Asian territory attached to a predominantly African state. Most of Egypt lies in northeastern Africa, while the Sinai Peninsula lies in Asia. The Suez Canal cuts through the isthmus between Africa and Asia but does not by itself create the continental division, because the Sinai Peninsula was geographically Asian before the modern canal was constructed.

The canal became an important artificial waterway linking the Mediterranean Sea with the Red Sea and separating the Sinai from the African mainland. Egypt therefore remains a transcontinental state regardless of the fact that its Asian territory is much smaller than its African territory. This example also demonstrates why physical geography and political geography interact but should not be confused. A political boundary can cross a natural geographical feature, and a canal can separate areas that were previously connected by land, without changing the underlying continental classification.

Kazakhstan demonstrates how the status of a transcontinental country can depend on the precise continental boundary convention being applied. The country lies overwhelmingly in Central Asia, but a relatively small portion west of the Ural River is conventionally classified as part of Europe. The Ural River is therefore sometimes used as part of the boundary between Europe and Asia. Under that convention Kazakhstan is a transcontinental country, although almost all of its territory and population are associated geographically with Asia.

Azerbaijan presents a more disputed case because different geographical traditions place the Europe Asia boundary differently through or around the Caucasus. If the boundary follows the Greater Caucasus watershed, parts of Azerbaijan may be classified as European, while other boundary systems place the entire country in Asia. Such cases show that transcontinental classification can be partly dependent on convention rather than on an uncontested natural fact.

The concept should also be distinguished from countries that have territories, dependencies or overseas possessions on another continent. France, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Portugal, the United Kingdom and the United States can have political territories or constituent territories geographically associated with different continents, but whether the sovereign state itself is described as transcontinental depends on the definition being used.

France, for example, has territory in South America through French Guiana and territories associated with the Caribbean, but many geographical classifications treat these as overseas territories rather than describing metropolitan France as a transcontinental country. Spain has territories and islands in Africa, while Portugal has Atlantic territories whose continental classification can differ from the classification of continental Europe. These examples demonstrate the importance of distinguishing a state whose continuous or constituent territory physically crosses a continental boundary from a state that possesses geographically separate overseas territories.

Transcontinental countries are significant because they demonstrate that continents are geographical frameworks rather than perfectly isolated political units. Continental boundaries can follow mountains, rivers, seas, cultural conventions or combinations of physical and historical criteria, and different authorities can therefore produce slightly different lists. The term transcontinental does not necessarily mean that the two portions are equal in size, equally populated or equally important politically.

Russia and Turkey have substantial territories on both sides of the conventional Europe Asia boundary, whereas Egypt has a relatively small Asian portion and Kazakhstan has a relatively small European portion. The most consistently cited sovereign states with territory in two continents are Russia, Turkey, Egypt, Kazakhstan and, under commonly used Caucasus boundary conventions, Azerbaijan, with Georgia sometimes included depending on the convention. The important principle is that the classification must identify the continental boundary being used before treating a borderline case as universally settled.