What is Underpainting?

Arts — James William Steven Parker

Underpainting is an initial layer or set of layers used to establish the foundational structure of a painting before subsequent colour and finishing stages are applied. It can establish drawing, composition, values, masses, colour temperature, tonal relationships, or an overall chromatic atmosphere. Underpainting is particularly associated with layered oil painting, but the general concept applies to acrylic, tempera, and other media. It does not have to be monochromatic, although monochromatic underpaintings are historically common.

A painter may use a neutral grey, brown, warm earth colour, complementary colour, or more fully coloured foundation depending on the intended effect. The underpainting may remain partially visible in the finished work or may be almost entirely covered by later layers. Its importance is that it provides a structural foundation that guides subsequent applications rather than requiring every visual decision to be made simultaneously on the final surface.

One traditional form of underpainting is monochromatic tonal construction, in which the artist first establishes light and dark relationships without fully developing local colour. Such a foundation can make later colour application more manageable because the major value structure has already been considered. Historical methods include systems associated with terms such as imprimatura, grisaille, brunaille, and verdaccio, although these terms refer to different practices and should not be treated as synonyms for underpainting in every context.

An imprimatura is generally a thin initial coloured stain or tone over the ground, while grisaille refers to monochromatic painting in grey values and related approaches. Verdaccio historically refers to a greenish underpainting used in some figurative traditions. These methods can function as underpaintings, but underpainting is the broader category describing an initial pictorial foundation.

Underpainting can influence the final colour through both visible remnants and optical interaction. If later layers are transparent or thin, the underlying colour may modify their appearance. A warm underpainting beneath cool local colours can contribute subtle warmth, while a complementary foundation can influence the apparent intensity of later passages. Even where the underpainting is mostly covered, small areas may remain visible around edges, through thin paint, or between brushstrokes.

This can create colour unity because the initial layer establishes a common chromatic environment. Painters can also deliberately leave portions exposed as part of the finished design. The underpainting therefore serves not only as a preparatory stage but potentially as an active component of the final surface.

Underpainting can help establish form through a process sometimes described as modelling. The artist may determine the broad light and shadow pattern before adding detailed local colour, ensuring that later colour applications reinforce rather than contradict the underlying structure. In portraiture, for example, an underpainting can establish the large planes of the face, shadow masses, and major highlights. In landscape, it can establish the distribution of land, sky, and atmospheric masses.

In still life, it can establish the silhouettes and value relationships of objects. The degree of detail is variable. Some artists use loose masses and broad strokes, while others develop a highly finished foundation before proceeding. The appropriate level depends on the painting method and the degree of control desired in later stages.

The historical role of underpainting is closely related to workshop practice, material economy, and the desire to organise complex paintings into manageable stages. In layered oil painting, artists could first create a structured foundation and then refine it through increasingly specific applications. This could reduce the need to solve every problem simultaneously and could provide a stable framework for colour development. However, historical artists did not all follow one standard procedure.

Techniques differed between artists, workshops, periods, pigments, supports, and intended finishes. Some paintings were built extensively through underpainting and glazing, while others were painted more directly. Examination of historical works using technical imaging and conservation analysis has demonstrated that visible final surfaces can conceal highly varied underlying processes. Underpainting is therefore a useful technical concept, not a universal historical formula.

The relationship between underpainting and later layers is especially important in oil painting because layer structure affects drying, adhesion, flexibility, and optical appearance. Traditional practice often distinguishes between relatively lean initial layers and richer upper layers, although the simplified phrase fat over lean does not by itself describe every modern oil painting system.

The painter must consider whether the chosen pigments and mediums dry at different rates and whether thick or oil rich layers are being placed in a structurally appropriate sequence. In acrylic painting, the rapid drying of the polymer binder permits different sequencing possibilities, but adhesion and surface characteristics still matter. The underpainting should therefore be understood as part of the complete material system rather than as an isolated colour exercise.

Underpainting differs from sketching, drawing, imprimatura, and preliminary studies even though these activities can overlap. A drawing may establish contour without establishing painted masses, whereas an underpainting generally involves actual paint and contributes to the eventual pictorial structure. An imprimatura may be only a thin overall tone rather than a developed representation of forms. A preliminary study may be a separate artwork used to plan the final composition rather than a physical layer within the final painting.

Some artists combine all these functions by making a thin drawing and tonal painting directly on the final support. The terminology therefore depends partly on what function the initial layer performs. The broadest useful definition is an initial painted foundation that prepares, structures, influences, or partially constructs the later image.

Underpainting has practical advantages but is not mandatory for every painting. It can clarify value structure, establish colour unity, reduce uncertainty during later stages, and provide a visual framework for glazing or opaque refinement. It can also become visible in ways that create unintended holes, colour shifts, or uneven coverage if the subsequent paint is too thin. Conversely, intentionally exposed underpainting can contribute liveliness and visual economy.

A common misconception is that every finished painting must contain a clearly identifiable underpainting, or that a particular underpainting colour guarantees a particular final effect. Neither is true. Underpainting is a flexible construction method whose usefulness depends on the painter's chosen medium, layering strategy, subject, desired surface, and relationship between the foundational layer and the later paint.